[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024022012-vocalize-vindicate-3eb3@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 16:11:21 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [v6.6][PATCH 00/57] eventfs: Linus's updates for 6.6
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 07:09:05AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> This is a backport of all the work that lead up to the work that Linus made
> on eventfs. I trust Linus's version more so than the versions in 6.6 and
> 6.7. There may be plenty of hidden issues due to the design.
>
> This is the update for 6.6. It includes Linus's updates as well as all the
> patches leading up to them. As the eventfs work went in in two parts, half
> went in in 6.6 and the other in 6.7, there were 6 backports that were done
> custom to 6.6 as the bugs found in 6.7 were in 6.6 but implemented
> differently. This series starts with reverting those 6 backports and then
> applying the updated patches to get to Linus's simplification.
>
> I ran these through my full test suite that I use before sending anything to
> Linus, although I did not run my "bisect" test that walks through the
> patches. The tests were just run on the end result.
>
> This was created with the following command against v6.6.15, after reverting
> the 6 patches:
All now queued up, thanks!
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists