[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65d4cc4b88e56_23483829431@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:59:07 -0500
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@...wei.com>,
willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
jasowang@...hat.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
brouer@...hat.com,
xudingke@...wei.com,
Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tun: Fix xdp_rxq_info's queue_index when detaching
Yunjian Wang wrote:
> When a queue(tfile) is detached, we only update tfile's queue_index,
> but do not update xdp_rxq_info's queue_index. This patch fixes it.
>
> Fixes: 8bf5c4ee1889 ("tun: setup xdp_rxq_info")
> Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/tun.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index bc80fc1d576e..be37235af55d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -652,6 +652,7 @@ static void __tun_detach(struct tun_file *tfile, bool clean)
> tun->tfiles[tun->numqueues - 1]);
> ntfile = rtnl_dereference(tun->tfiles[index]);
> ntfile->queue_index = index;
> + ntfile->xdp_rxq.queue_index = index;
> rcu_assign_pointer(tun->tfiles[tun->numqueues - 1],
> NULL);
Does it matter that this value is stale when undetached?
It is replaced in tun_attach if previously attached:
/* Re-attach detached tfile, updating XDP queue_index */
WARN_ON(!xdp_rxq_info_is_reg(&tfile->xdp_rxq));
if (tfile->xdp_rxq.queue_index != tfile->queue_index)
tfile->xdp_rxq.queue_index = tfile->queue_index;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists