linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] drm/dp: move intel_dp_vsc_sdp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAA8EJpqaG+fBA_FO-L7Bimtjqqg3ZDQtyJL0oPFEueb-1WxjUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 21:05:56 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, 
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, 
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>, 
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>, robdclark@...il.com, 
	freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com, quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/dp: move intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack() to generic helper

On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 20:53, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/20/2024 10:49 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 21:08, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack() can be re-used by other DRM drivers as well.
> >> Lets move this to drm_dp_helper to achieve this.
> >>
> >> changes in v2:
> >>          - rebased on top of drm-tip
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> >
> > v1 had an explicit comment before the ack:
> >
>
> Yes, I remember the comment. I did not make any changes to v2 other than
> just rebasing it on drm-tip to get the ack from i915 folks.
>
> >>     From my side, with the promise of the size fixup.
> >
> > However I observe neither a second patch removing the size argument
> > nor it being dropped as a part of this patch.
> >
>
> Yes, now that in v2 we got the ack for this patch, I can spin a v3 with
> the addition of the next patch to remove the size OR as another series
> so as to not block the main series which needs this patch.
>
> I would prefer the latter.

It doesn't work this way. The comment should have been fixed for v2.



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry