linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] drm/dp: move intel_dp_vsc_sdp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 21:17:22 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, 
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, 
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>, 
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>, robdclark@...il.com, 
	freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com, quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/dp: move intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack() to generic helper

On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 21:09, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/20/2024 11:05 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 20:53, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2/20/2024 10:49 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 21:08, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack() can be re-used by other DRM drivers as well.
> >>>> Lets move this to drm_dp_helper to achieve this.
> >>>>
> >>>> changes in v2:
> >>>>           - rebased on top of drm-tip
> >>>>
> >>>> Acked-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> >>>
> >>> v1 had an explicit comment before the ack:
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yes, I remember the comment. I did not make any changes to v2 other than
> >> just rebasing it on drm-tip to get the ack from i915 folks.
> >>
> >>>>      From my side, with the promise of the size fixup.
> >>>
> >>> However I observe neither a second patch removing the size argument
> >>> nor it being dropped as a part of this patch.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yes, now that in v2 we got the ack for this patch, I can spin a v3 with
> >> the addition of the next patch to remove the size OR as another series
> >> so as to not block the main series which needs this patch.
> >>
> >> I would prefer the latter.
> >
> > It doesn't work this way. The comment should have been fixed for v2.
> >
>
> Ack, I can post a v3 now by adding the removal in patch 2 of this series.

Yes, please.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry