[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240220193614.b2rbzxmbobp3cbv2@offworld>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 11:36:14 -0800
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, mpatocka@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
msnitzer@...hat.com, ignat@...udflare.com, damien.lemoal@....com,
bob.liu@...cle.com, houtao1@...wei.com, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com,
kernel-team@...a.com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
mchehab@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] usb: core: hcd: Convert from tasklet to BH workqueue
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>Mauro - the BH workqueue should provide the same kind of latency as
>the tasklets, and it would be good to validate early that yes, this
>workqueue conversion works well in practice. Since you have an actual
>real-life test-case, could you give it a try?
In general I think it's worth pointing out that future conversions should
still aim for an equivalent in task context, and now with disable/enable_work
a lot opens up for regular wq conversions. If users/maintainers shout about
latency, then use BH wq.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists