linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] drm/dp: move intel_dp_vsc_sdp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <16a720e8-f3bb-2059-3b7a-65311c3aaa64@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 11:49:06 -0800
From: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
To: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Maarten Lankhorst
	<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen
	<joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin
	<tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
        <robdclark@...il.com>, <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/dp: move intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack() to generic helper



On 2/20/2024 11:41 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 11:27:18AM -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/20/2024 11:20 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 21:05, Dmitry Baryshkov
>>> <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 20:53, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/20/2024 10:49 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 21:08, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack() can be re-used by other DRM drivers as well.
>>>>>>> Lets move this to drm_dp_helper to achieve this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> changes in v2:
>>>>>>>            - rebased on top of drm-tip
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Acked-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> v1 had an explicit comment before the ack:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I remember the comment. I did not make any changes to v2 other than
>>>>> just rebasing it on drm-tip to get the ack from i915 folks.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>       From my side, with the promise of the size fixup.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However I observe neither a second patch removing the size argument
>>>>>> nor it being dropped as a part of this patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, now that in v2 we got the ack for this patch, I can spin a v3 with
>>>>> the addition of the next patch to remove the size OR as another series
>>>>> so as to not block the main series which needs this patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would prefer the latter.
>>>>
>>>> It doesn't work this way. The comment should have been fixed for v2.
>>>
>>> This probably deserves some explanation. Currently there is only one
>>> user of this function. So it is easy to fix it. Once there are several
>>> users, you have to fix all of them at the same time, patching
>>> different drm subtrees. That complicates the life of maintainers.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, understood. Its easier to fix it now if its really needed.
>>
>> Actually, I think the reason the size was passed was to make sure
>> a valid struct dp_sdp *sdp was being passed.
> 
> The size is supposed to be the size of *hardware* buffer where this
> gets written into. But looks like this wasn't done correctly when
> the code was copy-pasted from the HDMI inforframe code.
> 

Alright, in that case, let me post a patch to drop this and let me know 
if that works for you.