| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <8ea640a1-fc2c-a6fa-cf4b-bb8c0b694b4f@oppo.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 12:00:05 +0800
From: 李培锋 <lipeifeng@...o.com>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...hat.com, osalvador@...e.de,
willy@...radead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tkjos@...gle.com, surenb@...gle.com, gregkh@...gle.com, v-songbaohua@...o.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/rmap: support folio_referenced to control if
try_lock in rmap_walk
在 2024/2/20 11:01, Barry Song 写道:
> Hi peifeng,
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 2:43 PM 李培锋 <lipeifeng@...o.com> wrote:
>> add more experts from Linux and Google.
>>
>>
>> 在 2024/2/19 22:17, lipeifeng@...o.com 写道:
>>> From: lipeifeng <lipeifeng@...o.com>
>>>
>>> The patch to support folio_referenced to control the bevavior
>>> of walk_rmap, which for some thread to hold the lock in rmap_walk
>>> instead of try_lock when using folio_referenced.
> please describe what problem the patch is trying to address,
> and why this modification is needed in commit message.
Hi Barry：
1. the patch is one of the kshrinkd series patches.
2. it is to support folio_referenced to control the bevavior of walk_rmap,
kshrinkd would call folio_referenced through shrink_folio_list but it
doesn't
want to try_lock in rmap_walk during folio_referenced.
> btw, who is set rw_try_lock to 0, what is the benefit?
Actually, the current situation is that only shrink_folio_list will set
try_lock to 1，
while others will be set to 0 that it would wait for rwsem-lock if
contened in rmap_walk.
>
>>> Signed-off-by: lipeifeng <lipeifeng@...o.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/rmap.h | 5 +++--
>>> mm/rmap.c | 5 +++--
>>> mm/vmscan.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>>> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/rmap.h b/include/linux/rmap.h
>>> index b7944a8..846b261 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/rmap.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/rmap.h
>>> @@ -623,7 +623,8 @@ static inline int folio_try_share_anon_rmap_pmd(struct folio *folio,
>>> * Called from mm/vmscan.c to handle paging out
>>> */
>>> int folio_referenced(struct folio *, int is_locked,
>>> - struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned long *vm_flags);
>>> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned long *vm_flags,
>>> + unsigned int rw_try_lock);
>>>
>>> void try_to_migrate(struct folio *folio, enum ttu_flags flags);
>>> void try_to_unmap(struct folio *, enum ttu_flags flags);
>>> @@ -739,7 +740,7 @@ struct anon_vma *folio_lock_anon_vma_read(struct folio *folio,
>>>
>>> static inline int folio_referenced(struct folio *folio, int is_locked,
>>> struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>>> - unsigned long *vm_flags)
>>> + unsigned long *vm_flags, unsigned int rw_try_lock)
>>> {
>>> *vm_flags = 0;
>>> return 0;
>>> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
>>> index f5d43ed..15d1fba 100644
>>> --- a/mm/rmap.c
>>> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
>>> @@ -952,6 +952,7 @@ static bool invalid_folio_referenced_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma, void *arg)
>>> * @is_locked: Caller holds lock on the folio.
>>> * @memcg: target memory cgroup
>>> * @vm_flags: A combination of all the vma->vm_flags which referenced the folio.
>>> + * @rw_try_lock: if try_lock in rmap_walk
>>> *
>>> * Quick test_and_clear_referenced for all mappings of a folio,
>>> *
>>> @@ -959,7 +960,7 @@ static bool invalid_folio_referenced_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma, void *arg)
>>> * the function bailed out due to rmap lock contention.
>>> */
>>> int folio_referenced(struct folio *folio, int is_locked,
>>> - struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned long *vm_flags)
>>> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned long *vm_flags, unsigned int rw_try_lock)
>>> {
>>> int we_locked = 0;
>>> struct folio_referenced_arg pra = {
>>> @@ -970,7 +971,7 @@ int folio_referenced(struct folio *folio, int is_locked,
>>> .rmap_one = folio_referenced_one,
>>> .arg = (void *)&pra,
>>> .anon_lock = folio_lock_anon_vma_read,
>>> - .try_lock = true,
>>> + .try_lock = rw_try_lock ? true : false,
>>> .invalid_vma = invalid_folio_referenced_vma,
>>> };
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
>>> index 4f9c854..0296d48 100644
>>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
>>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>>> @@ -136,6 +136,9 @@ struct scan_control {
>>> /* Always discard instead of demoting to lower tier memory */
>>> unsigned int no_demotion:1;
>>>
>>> + /* if try_lock in rmap_walk */
>>> + unsigned int rw_try_lock:1;
>>> +
>>> /* Allocation order */
>>> s8 order;
>>>
>>> @@ -827,7 +830,7 @@ static enum folio_references folio_check_references(struct folio *folio,
>>> unsigned long vm_flags;
>>>
>>> referenced_ptes = folio_referenced(folio, 1, sc->target_mem_cgroup,
>>> - &vm_flags);
>>> + &vm_flags, sc->rw_try_lock);
>>> referenced_folio = folio_test_clear_referenced(folio);
>>>
>>> /*
>>> @@ -1501,6 +1504,7 @@ unsigned int reclaim_clean_pages_from_list(struct zone *zone,
>>> struct scan_control sc = {
>>> .gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
>>> .may_unmap = 1,
>>> + .rw_try_lock = 1,
>>> };
>>> struct reclaim_stat stat;
>>> unsigned int nr_reclaimed;
>>> @@ -2038,7 +2042,7 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
>>>
>>> /* Referenced or rmap lock contention: rotate */
>>> if (folio_referenced(folio, 0, sc->target_mem_cgroup,
>>> - &vm_flags) != 0) {
>>> + &vm_flags, sc->rw_try_lock) != 0) {
>>> /*
>>> * Identify referenced, file-backed active folios and
>>> * give them one more trip around the active list. So
>>> @@ -2096,6 +2100,7 @@ static unsigned int reclaim_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list,
>>> .may_unmap = 1,
>>> .may_swap = 1,
>>> .no_demotion = 1,
>>> + .rw_try_lock = 1,
>>> };
>>>
>>> nr_reclaimed = shrink_folio_list(folio_list, pgdat, &sc, &dummy_stat, false);
>>> @@ -5442,6 +5447,7 @@ static ssize_t lru_gen_seq_write(struct file *file, const char __user *src,
>>> .may_swap = true,
>>> .reclaim_idx = MAX_NR_ZONES - 1,
>>> .gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
>>> + .rw_try_lock = 1,
>>> };
>>>
>>> buf = kvmalloc(len + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> @@ -6414,6 +6420,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order,
>>> .may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
>>> .may_unmap = 1,
>>> .may_swap = 1,
>>> + .rw_try_lock = 1,
>>> };
>>>
>>> /*
>>> @@ -6459,6 +6466,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>>> .may_unmap = 1,
>>> .reclaim_idx = MAX_NR_ZONES - 1,
>>> .may_swap = !noswap,
>>> + .rw_try_lock = 1,
>>> };
>>>
>>> WARN_ON_ONCE(!current->reclaim_state);
>>> @@ -6503,6 +6511,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>>> .may_unmap = 1,
>>> .may_swap = !!(reclaim_options & MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP),
>>> .proactive = !!(reclaim_options & MEMCG_RECLAIM_PROACTIVE),
>>> + .rw_try_lock = 1,
>>> };
>>> /*
>>> * Traverse the ZONELIST_FALLBACK zonelist of the current node to put
>>> @@ -6764,6 +6773,7 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int highest_zoneidx)
>>> .gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
>>> .order = order,
>>> .may_unmap = 1,
>>> + .rw_try_lock = 1,
>>> };
>>>
>>> set_task_reclaim_state(current, &sc.reclaim_state);
>>> @@ -7223,6 +7233,7 @@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned long nr_to_reclaim)
>>> .may_unmap = 1,
>>> .may_swap = 1,
>>> .hibernation_mode = 1,
>>> + .rw_try_lock = 1,
>>> };
>>> struct zonelist *zonelist = node_zonelist(numa_node_id(), sc.gfp_mask);
>>> unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
>>> @@ -7381,6 +7392,7 @@ static int __node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned in
>>> .may_unmap = !!(node_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_UNMAP),
>>> .may_swap = 1,
>>> .reclaim_idx = gfp_zone(gfp_mask),
>>> + .rw_try_lock = 1,
>>> };
>>> unsigned long pflags;
>>>
> Thanks
> Barry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists