linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] acpi,pci: warn about duplicate IRQ routing entries returned from

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZdUjvUG3aUgGCwBs@surfacebook.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 00:12:13 +0200
From: andy.shevchenko@...il.com
To: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@...pl>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] acpi,pci: warn about duplicate IRQ routing entries
 returned from _PRT

Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 01:42:54PM +0100, Mateusz Jończyk kirjoitti:
> On some platforms, the ACPI _PRT function returns duplicate interrupt
> routing entries. Linux uses the first matching entry, but sometimes the
> second matching entry contains the correct interrupt vector.
> 
> As a debugging aid, print a warning to dmesg if duplicate interrupt
> routing entries are present. This way, we could check how many models
> are affected.
> 
> This happens on a Dell Latitude E6500 laptop with the i2c-i801 Intel
> SMBus controller. This controller is nonfunctional unless its interrupt
> usage is disabled (using the "disable_features=0x10" module parameter).
> 
> After investigation, it turned out that the driver was using an
> incorrect interrupt vector: in lspci output for this device there was:
>         Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 19
> but after running i2cdetect (without using any i2c-i801 module
> parameters) the following was logged to dmesg:
> 
>         [...]
>         i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: Timeout waiting for interrupt!
>         i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: Transaction timeout
>         i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: Timeout waiting for interrupt!
>         i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: Transaction timeout
>         irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
> 
> Existence of duplicate entries in a table returned by the _PRT method
> was confirmed by disassembling the ACPI DSDT table.
> 
> Windows XP is using IRQ3 (as reported by HWiNFO32 and in the Device
> Manager), which is neither of the two vectors returned by _PRT.
> As HWiNFO32 decoded contents of the SPD EEPROMs, the i2c-i801 device is
> working under Windows. It appears that Windows has reconfigured the
> chipset independently to use another interrupt vector for the device.
> This is possible, according to the chipset datasheet [1], page 436 for
> example (PIRQ[n]_ROUT—PIRQ[A,B,C,D] Routing Control Register).

> [1] https://www.intel.com/content/dam/doc/datasheet/io-controller-hub-9-datasheet.pdf
> 

Can you convert this to be a Link tag?

Link: ...URL... # [1]
Signed-off-by: ...

> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@...pl>

> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>

Please, move these (Cc lines) down after --- cutter line.

> Previously-reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
> Previously-tested-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>

This shouldn't be in the commit message, just use the comment block
(after --- line) for this.

..

>  	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
>  	struct acpi_pci_routing_table *entry;
>  	acpi_handle handle = NULL;
> +	struct acpi_prt_entry *match = NULL;
> +	const char *match_int_source = NULL;

Can you preserve reversed xmas tree ordering?

..

>  	while (entry && (entry->length > 0)) {
> -		if (!acpi_pci_irq_check_entry(handle, dev, pin,
> -						 entry, entry_ptr))
> -			break;
> +		struct acpi_prt_entry *curr;
> +
> +		if (!acpi_pci_irq_check_entry(handle, dev, pin, entry, &curr)) {

> +			if (!match) {

Why not positive condition?

> +				match = curr;
> +				match_int_source = entry->source;
> +			} else {
> +				dev_warn(&dev->dev, FW_BUG
> +				       "ACPI _PRT returned duplicate IRQ routing entries for INT%c: %s[%d] and %s[%d]\n",
> +				       pin_name(curr->pin),
> +				       match_int_source, match->index,
> +				       entry->source, curr->index);
> +				/* We use the first matching entry nonetheless,
> +				 * for compatibility with older kernels.
> +				 */
> +			}
> +		}

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko