[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wmqzpusr.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 13:29:56 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
Cc: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <osalvador@...e.de>,
<baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, <hannes@...xchg.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<kernel_team@...ynix.com>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan: Fix a bug calling wakeup_kswapd() with a
wrong zone index
Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 11:42:31AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com> writes:
>>
>> > With numa balancing on, when a numa system is running where a numa node
>> > doesn't have its local memory so it has no managed zones, the following
>> > oops has been observed. It's because wakeup_kswapd() is called with a
>> > wrong zone index, -1. Fixed it by checking the index before calling
>> > wakeup_kswapd().
>> >
>> >> BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000000033f3
>> >> #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
>> >> #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
>> >> PGD 0 P4D 0
>> >> Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
>> >> CPU: 2 PID: 895 Comm: masim Not tainted 6.6.0-dirty #255
>> >> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
>> >> rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
>> >> RIP: 0010:wakeup_kswapd (./linux/mm/vmscan.c:7812)
>> >> Code: (omitted)
>> >> RSP: 0000:ffffc90004257d58 EFLAGS: 00010286
>> >> RAX: ffffffffffffffff RBX: ffff88883fff0480 RCX: 0000000000000003
>> >> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88883fff0480
>> >> RBP: ffffffffffffffff R08: ff0003ffffffffff R09: ffffffffffffffff
>> >> R10: ffff888106c95540 R11: 0000000055555554 R12: 0000000000000003
>> >> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88883fff0940
>> >> FS: 00007fc4b8124740(0000) GS:ffff888827c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>> >> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>> >> CR2: 00000000000033f3 CR3: 000000026cc08004 CR4: 0000000000770ee0
>> >> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>> >> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>> >> PKRU: 55555554
>> >> Call Trace:
>> >> <TASK>
>> >> ? __die
>> >> ? page_fault_oops
>> >> ? __pte_offset_map_lock
>> >> ? exc_page_fault
>> >> ? asm_exc_page_fault
>> >> ? wakeup_kswapd
>> >> migrate_misplaced_page
>> >> __handle_mm_fault
>> >> handle_mm_fault
>> >> do_user_addr_fault
>> >> exc_page_fault
>> >> asm_exc_page_fault
>> >> RIP: 0033:0x55b897ba0808
>> >> Code: (omitted)
>> >> RSP: 002b:00007ffeefa821a0 EFLAGS: 00010287
>> >> RAX: 000055b89983acd0 RBX: 00007ffeefa823f8 RCX: 000055b89983acd0
>> >> RDX: 00007fc2f8122010 RSI: 0000000000020000 RDI: 000055b89983acd0
>> >> RBP: 00007ffeefa821a0 R08: 0000000000000037 R09: 0000000000000075
>> >> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000000
>> >> R13: 00007ffeefa82410 R14: 000055b897ba5dd8 R15: 00007fc4b8340000
>> >> </TASK>
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
>> > Reported-by: Hyeongtak Ji <hyeongtak.ji@...com>
>> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>> > Fixes: c574bbe917036 ("NUMA balancing: optimize page placement for memory tiering system")
>> > ---
>> > mm/migrate.c | 8 ++++++++
>> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
>> > index fbc8586ed735..51ee6865b0f6 100644
>> > --- a/mm/migrate.c
>> > +++ b/mm/migrate.c
>> > @@ -2825,6 +2825,14 @@ static int numamigrate_isolate_folio(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct folio *folio)
>> > if (managed_zone(pgdat->node_zones + z))
>> > break;
>> > }
>> > +
>> > + /*
>> > + * If there are no managed zones, it should not proceed
>> > + * further.
>> > + */
>> > + if (z < 0)
>> > + return 0;
>> > +
>>
>> I think that it's better to check pgdat->nr_zones directly earlier in
>> the function. That is a little easier to be understood.
>
> No. No matter what the value of ->nr_zones is, the oops is going to
> happen if there are no managed zones by any reason.
Yes. You are right. Sorry for noise.
--
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
> Byungchul
>
>> > wakeup_kswapd(pgdat->node_zones + z, 0,
>> > folio_order(folio), ZONE_MOVABLE);
>> > return 0;
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Huang, Ying
Powered by blists - more mailing lists