linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/3] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Do not use readl() for policy buffer access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240220054513.2832-2-W_Armin@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 06:45:12 +0100
From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>
To: Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com,
	mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com
Cc: hdegoede@...hat.com,
	ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Do not use readl() for policy buffer access

The policy buffer is allocated using normal memory allocation
functions, so readl() should not be used on it.
Use get_unaligned_le32() instead.

Compile-tested only.

Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
index 16973bebf55f..3220b6580270 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 #include <linux/debugfs.h>
 #include <linux/tee_drv.h>
 #include <linux/uuid.h>
+#include <asm/unaligned.h>
 #include "pmf.h"

 #define MAX_TEE_PARAM	4
@@ -249,8 +250,8 @@ static int amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 	u32 cookie, length;
 	int res;

-	cookie = readl(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_OFFSET);
-	length = readl(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_LEN);
+	cookie = get_unaligned_le32(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_OFFSET);
+	length = get_unaligned_le32(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_LEN);

 	if (cookie != POLICY_SIGN_COOKIE || !length)
 		return -EINVAL;
--
2.39.2