linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] hugetlb: two small improvements of hugetlb init parallelization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <00ae16dd-1558-4e45-b2c6-31f3f421d178@linux.dev>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 14:17:02 +0800
From: Gang Li <gang.li@...ux.dev>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] hugetlb: two small improvements of hugetlb init
 parallelization

On 2024/2/20 09:52, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 11:03:29 +0800 Gang Li <gang.li@...ux.dev> wrote:
> 
>> On 2024/2/13 19:13, Gang Li wrote:
>>> This series includes two improvements: fixing the PADATA Kconfig warning
>>> and a potential bug in gather_bootmem_prealloc_parallel. Please refer to
>>> the specific commit message for details.
>>>
>>> For Andrew:
>>> If you want me to include these two fixes into the previous series[1], I
>>> would be happy to send v6. Otherwise, you can directly apply these two
>>> patches.
>>>
>>> [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240126152411.1238072-1-gang.li@linux.dev/
>>
>> Hi Andrew,
>> A gentle ping here :).
>>
>> Do you want to apply these two patches, or would you like me to
>> include them into the original patch and send out v6?
> 
> The patchset is now rather a mess and I'm not confidently identifying
> which issues remain open and which are addressed.
> 
> So yes, a full redo and resend would be preferred, please.
> 
> Links which I collected are:
> 
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/202402020454.6EPkP1hi-lkp@intel.com
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240204072525.1986626-1-gang.li@linux.dev
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/6A148F29-68B2-4365-872C-E6AB599C55F6@linux.dev
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/j7xb7m5cy374ngbdm23rvryq6vy6jxtewtu3abjeidhho4bly7@t3aawaeybxlk

In summary, there is two issues based on v5[1] and all are fixed by my
patch.

Scattered discussions led to some confusion, I'll make it clear in the
next version.

Thanks.

[1]. 
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240126152411.1238072-1-gang.li@linux.dev/