[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d27bc0d9-1a7f-4451-83ec-bf24df08f12e@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:19:37 +0000
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, sagi@...mberg.me, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, djwong@...nel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
brauner@...nel.org, dchinner@...hat.com, jack@...e.cz,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
tytso@....edu, jbongio@...gle.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com, linux-aio@...ck.org,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
nilay@...ux.ibm.com, ritesh.list@...il.com,
Alan Adamson <alan.adamson@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] nvme: Atomic write support
On 20/02/2024 06:55, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 12:21:14PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
>> Maybe patch 11 should be folded into this one. No bigged, the series as
>> a whole looks good.
>
> I did suggest just that last round already..
>
I created the helper function and folded it in, but not the callsite.
Not folding in the callsite change did not make sense to me, but that
was my understanding of the request. Anyway, I can fold everything into
this patch.
Thanks,
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists