Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 09:21:54 +0100
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Vijendar Mukunda" <vijendar.mukunda@....com>,
 "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>,
 "Pierre-Louis Bossart" <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
 "Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
 "Peter Ujfalusi" <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>,
 "Bard Liao" <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
 "Ranjani Sridharan" <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
 "Daniel Baluta" <daniel.baluta@....com>, "Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: "Kai Vehmanen" <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
 "Jaroslav Kysela" <perex@...ex.cz>, "Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@...e.com>,
 "Venkata Prasad Potturu" <venkataprasad.potturu@....com>,
 sound-open-firmware@...a-project.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 "Dommati, Sunil-kumar" <Sunil-kumar.Dommati@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: amd: fix soundwire dependencies

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024, at 08:54, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote:
> On 20/02/24 12:40, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024, at 07:23, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote:
>>> On 20/02/24 11:43, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024, at 06:57, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote:
>>>>> On 19/02/24 15:08, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>>>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>>>>>> In normal configs, they should all either be built-in or all loadable
>>>>>> modules anyway, so this simplification does not limit any real usecases.
>>>>> Tested this patch. SOUNWIRE_AMD flag is not selected by default causing
>>>>> AMD SOF driver for ACP 6.3 platform is build without enabling SoundWire.
>>>> Yes, that is what I described. But as SOUNWIRE_AMD is a user visible
>>>> symbol, there is no problem in expecting users to enable it when they
>>>> have this hardware, and distros just enable all the drivers anyway.
>>> Want to set SOUNDWIRE_AMD flag by default, similar to Intel & Qcom
>>> platforms instead of explicitly enabling the Kconfig option.
>> Maybe use 'default SND_SOC_SOF_AMD_TOPLEVEL' then?
> Didn't get your point.
>
> Even with the current patch, if we select 'SOUNDWIRE_AMD' flag explicitly
> AMD ACP63 SOF driver Kconfig option is not visible for user configuration.
> This results in ACP63 SOF driver won't be built at all.

I don't understand what you mean here. What I see
in linux-next both with and without my patch is

config SND_SOC_SOF_AMD_ACP63
        tristate "SOF support for ACP6.3 platform"
        depends on SND_SOC_SOF_PCI

so it clearly should be visible as long as SND_SOC_SOF_PCI
is enabled.

There is still a problem that SND_SOC_SOF_AMD_TOPLEVEL
can't use my "depends on SOUNDWIRE_AMD || !SOUNDWIRE_AMD"
trick if SOUNDWIRE_AMD in turn uses
"default SND_SOC_SOF_AMD_TOPLEVEL", but I don't think you
meant that, right?

>> I don't think copying the mistake from the intel driver
>> is helpful, though I agree it would be nice to be consistent
>> between them.
>>
>> As a general rule, you should not have a Kconfig symbol that
>> is both user visible and also selected by the drivers that
>> depend on it.
>>
>> To avoid the dependency problems from coming back and keep
>> the complexity to a minimum, I think there are two logical
>> ways to handle soundwire:
>>
>> a) keep the current drivers/soundwire/Kconfig contents and
>>    change all the 'select SOUNDWIRE_foo' to 'depends on'.
>
> Current patch already using 'depends on SOUNDWIRE_AMD" for
> SND_SOC_SOF_AMD_SOUNDWIRE Kconfig option.

Correct, because this is the Kconfig option that actually
controls whether sound/soc/sof/amd/acp-common.c calls into
the soundwire-amd module.

> Still we couldn't see SND_SOC_SOF_AMD_ACP63 Kconfig option
> is enabled.

I need more information here. Do you have additional
patches on top of what is in today's linux-next?
I have it enabled on my build here.

      Arnd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists