linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] ARM: configs: at91: Enable LVDS serializer support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 09:45:21 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Dharma Balasubiramani <dharma.b@...rochip.com>, andrzej.hajda@...el.com,
 neil.armstrong@...aro.org, rfoss@...nel.org,
 Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, jonas@...boo.se,
 jernej.skrabec@...il.com, maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com,
 mripard@...nel.org, tzimmermann@...e.de, airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
 robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 manikandan.m@...rochip.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
 nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
 claudiu.beznea@...on.dev, geert+renesas@...der.be, arnd@...db.de,
 palmer@...osinc.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, gerg@...ux-m68k.org,
 rdunlap@...radead.org, vbabka@...e.cz, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango <hari.prasathge@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] ARM: configs: at91: Enable LVDS serializer support

On 07/02/2024 11:28, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote:
> Enable LVDS serializer support for display pipeline.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dharma Balasubiramani <dharma.b@...rochip.com>
> Acked-by: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango <hari.prasathge@...rochip.com>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
> ---
> Changelog
> v2 -> v3
> - No Changes.
> ---

In other email thread you mentioned that this depends on driver changes,
while that's only partially correct. This patch does not make sense if
others are not accepted, but the others are not dependency for this one.
This should go via arm soc.

In the future, please state clearly dependencies in cover letter or each
patch changelog (so ---, not commit msg).

Best regards,
Krzysztof