[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4e984b59-b50c-48dc-abbf-8045d924331b@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 09:01:14 +0000
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, kbusch@...nel.org, hch@....de, sagi@...mberg.me,
jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com, djwong@...nel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org, dchinner@...hat.com,
jack@...e.cz, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu, jbongio@...gle.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-aio@...ck.org,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
nilay@...ux.ibm.com, ritesh.list@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/11] scsi: scsi_debug: Atomic write support
On 20/02/2024 07:12, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
>> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(atomic_write, "enable ATOMIC WRITE support, support WRITE ATOMIC(16) (def=1)");
> Hi John,
>
> The default value here seems to be 0 and not 1. Got me a bit confused
> while testing 🙂
I can fix that MODULE_PARM_DESC() text.
I don't think that many disks support atomic writes, so I was leaving
this disabled by default.
Thanks,
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists