[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240220090645.108625-3-chentao@kylinos.cn>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 17:06:41 +0800
From: Kunwu Chan <chentao@...inos.cn>
To: clm@...com,
josef@...icpanda.com,
dsterba@...e.com
Cc: linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kunwu Chan <chentao@...inos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] btrfs: Simplify the allocation of slab caches in ordered_data_init
Use the new KMEM_CACHE() macro instead of direct kmem_cache_create
to simplify the creation of SLAB caches.
Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <chentao@...inos.cn>
---
fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
index 59850dc17b22..f65d681f4c65 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
@@ -1236,10 +1236,7 @@ struct btrfs_ordered_extent *btrfs_split_ordered_extent(
int __init ordered_data_init(void)
{
- btrfs_ordered_extent_cache = kmem_cache_create("btrfs_ordered_extent",
- sizeof(struct btrfs_ordered_extent), 0,
- SLAB_MEM_SPREAD,
- NULL);
+ btrfs_ordered_extent_cache = KMEM_CACHE(btrfs_ordered_extent, SLAB_MEM_SPREAD);
if (!btrfs_ordered_extent_cache)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists