lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 09:14:23 +0000
From: Paul Durrant <xadimgnik@...il.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, Alexander Gordeev
 <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>, Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
 x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
 kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 00/21] KVM: xen: update shared_info and vcpu_info
 handling

On 19/02/2024 22:06, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> David Woodhouse (1):
>>    KVM: pfncache: rework __kvm_gpc_refresh() to fix locking issues
>>
>> Paul Durrant (19):
>>    KVM: pfncache: Add a map helper function
>>    KVM: pfncache: remove unnecessary exports
>>    KVM: x86/xen: mark guest pages dirty with the pfncache lock held
>>    KVM: pfncache: add a mark-dirty helper
>>    KVM: pfncache: remove KVM_GUEST_USES_PFN usage
>>    KVM: pfncache: stop open-coding offset_in_page()
>>    KVM: pfncache: include page offset in uhva and use it consistently
>>    KVM: pfncache: allow a cache to be activated with a fixed (userspace)
>>      HVA
>>    KVM: x86/xen: separate initialization of shared_info cache and content
>>    KVM: x86/xen: re-initialize shared_info if guest (32/64-bit) mode is
>>      set
>>    KVM: x86/xen: allow shared_info to be mapped by fixed HVA
>>    KVM: x86/xen: allow vcpu_info to be mapped by fixed HVA
>>    KVM: selftests: map Xen's shared_info page using HVA rather than GFN
>>    KVM: selftests: re-map Xen's vcpu_info using HVA rather than GPA
>>    KVM: x86/xen: advertize the KVM_XEN_HVM_CONFIG_SHARED_INFO_HVA
>>      capability
>>    KVM: x86/xen: split up kvm_xen_set_evtchn_fast()
>>    KVM: x86/xen: don't block on pfncache locks in
>>      kvm_xen_set_evtchn_fast()
>>    KVM: pfncache: check the need for invalidation under read lock first
>>    KVM: x86/xen: allow vcpu_info content to be 'safely' copied
>>
>> Sean Christopherson (1):
>>    KVM: s390: Refactor kvm_is_error_gpa() into kvm_is_gpa_in_memslot()
>>
>>   Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst                |  53 ++-
>>   arch/s390/kvm/diag.c                          |   2 +-
>>   arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c                       |  14 +-
>>   arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c                      |   4 +-
>>   arch/s390/kvm/priv.c                          |   4 +-
>>   arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c                          |   2 +-
>>   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                            |   7 +-
>>   arch/x86/kvm/xen.c                            | 361 +++++++++++------
>>   include/linux/kvm_host.h                      |  49 ++-
>>   include/linux/kvm_types.h                     |   8 -
>>   include/uapi/linux/kvm.h                      |   9 +-
>>   .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/xen_shinfo_test.c    |  59 ++-
>>   virt/kvm/pfncache.c                           | 382 ++++++++++--------
>>   13 files changed, 591 insertions(+), 363 deletions(-)
> 
> Except for the read_trylock() patch, just a few nits that I can fixup when
> applying, though I'll defeinitely want your eyeballs on the end result as they
> tweaks aren't _that_ trivial.
> 
> Running tests now, if all goes well I'll push to kvm-x86 within the hour.

Oh, I read this last and you already made the changes :-) I'll check 
kvm-x86. Thanks.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ