[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240220092705.GU52537@atomide.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 11:27:05 +0200
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
	Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, cocci@...ia.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] clk: ti: Adjustments for eight function
 implementations
* Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> [231227 16:39]:
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 05:33:53PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> > Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2023 17:03:21 +0100
> > 
> > Several update suggestions were taken into account
> > from static source code analysis.
> 
> Unneeded churn, if you want to make it better, switch the code to use
> cleanup.h.
Yes cleanup.h sounds good to me too.
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
