[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <335d1e82-8e70-475d-a4d5-12dbbd7ca660@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 17:49:16 +0800
From: Bitao Hu <yaoma@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, dianders@...omium.org,
pmladek@...e.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kernelfans@...il.com,
liusong@...ux.alibaba.com, deller@....de, npiggin@...il.com,
jan.kiszka@...mens.com, kbingham@...nel.org
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 2/2] watchdog/softlockup: report the most frequent
interrupts
Hi,
On 2024/2/20 17:35, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20 2024 at 00:19, Bitao Hu wrote:
>> arch/mips/dec/setup.c | 2 +-
>> arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c | 2 +-
>> include/linux/irqdesc.h | 9 ++-
>> include/linux/kernel_stat.h | 4 +
>> kernel/irq/internals.h | 2 +-
>> kernel/irq/irqdesc.c | 34 ++++++--
>> kernel/irq/proc.c | 9 +--
>
> This really wants to be split into two patches. Interrupt infrastructure
> first and then the actual usage site in the watchdog code.
>
Okay, I will split it into two patches.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists