linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] w1: Convert to platform remove callback returning void

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c0b6dd69-c52f-4da3-8eda-d6eeb544cb25@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 11:21:46 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] w1: Convert to platform remove callback returning
 void

On 20/02/2024 11:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 19/02/2024 21:25, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 11:59:26AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>> this series converts all drivers below drivers/w1 to struct
>>> platform_driver::remove_new(). See commit 5c5a7680e67b ("platform:
>>> Provide a remove callback that returns no value") for an extended
>>> explanation and the eventual goal.
>>>
>>> All four conversations are trivial, because their .remove() callbacks
>>> returned zero unconditionally. 
>>>
>>> There are no interdependencies between these patches, so they could be
>>> picked up individually. However I'd expect them to go in all together
>>> via Krzysztof's tree.
>>
>> This series hit a corner case in my patch sending scripts (because the
>> maintainer entry title has a ' which I failed to properly quote). I'll
>> try to resend the patches that didn't hit the mailing list.
> 
> I don't know what you are referring to. I don't think I ever received
> your patchset and from another patchset - linked here, but not marked as
> resend? - I got only two patches.
> 
> Please make a proper submission. Don't attach your patchsets to some
> other threads. If this is resend, add proper "RESEND PATCH" prefix.
> 

I think I got the rest of patches here, although this is still oddly
threaded.

Best regards,
Krzysztof