linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the arm64 tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240220132157.6d3cd5dd@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 13:21:57 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Christoffer Dall <cdall@...columbia.edu>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the arm64 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c

between commits:

  352b0395b505 ("arm64: Enable 52-bit virtual addressing for 4k and 16k granule configs")
  2aea7b77aabc ("arm64: Use Signed/Unsigned enums for TGRAN{4,16,64} and VARange")

from the arm64 tree and commit:

  da9af5071b25 ("arm64: cpufeature: Detect HCR_EL2.NV1 being RES0")

from the kvm-arm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index d380ae783b73,f309fd542c20..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@@ -721,13 -754,12 +756,14 @@@ static const struct __ftr_reg_entry 
  			       &id_aa64isar2_override),
  
  	/* Op1 = 0, CRn = 0, CRm = 7 */
 -	ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1, ftr_id_aa64mmfr0),
 +	ARM64_FTR_REG_OVERRIDE(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1, ftr_id_aa64mmfr0,
 +			       &id_aa64mmfr0_override),
  	ARM64_FTR_REG_OVERRIDE(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1, ftr_id_aa64mmfr1,
  			       &id_aa64mmfr1_override),
 -	ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1, ftr_id_aa64mmfr2),
 +	ARM64_FTR_REG_OVERRIDE(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1, ftr_id_aa64mmfr2,
 +			       &id_aa64mmfr2_override),
  	ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1, ftr_id_aa64mmfr3),
+ 	ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1, ftr_id_aa64mmfr4),
  
  	/* Op1 = 1, CRn = 0, CRm = 0 */
  	ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_GMID_EL1, ftr_gmid),
@@@ -2701,24 -2817,13 +2779,31 @@@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilit
  		.type = ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE,
  		.matches = has_lpa2,
  	},
 +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS_52
 +	{
 +		.capability = ARM64_HAS_VA52,
 +		.type = ARM64_CPUCAP_BOOT_CPU_FEATURE,
 +		.matches = has_cpuid_feature,
 +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES
 +		.desc = "52-bit Virtual Addressing (LVA)",
 +		ARM64_CPUID_FIELDS(ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1, VARange, 52)
 +#else
 +		.desc = "52-bit Virtual Addressing (LPA2)",
 +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES
 +		ARM64_CPUID_FIELDS(ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1, TGRAN4, 52_BIT)
 +#else
 +		ARM64_CPUID_FIELDS(ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1, TGRAN16, 52_BIT)
 +#endif
 +#endif
 +	},
 +#endif
+ 	{
+ 		.desc = "NV1",
+ 		.capability = ARM64_HAS_HCR_NV1,
+ 		.type = ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE,
+ 		.matches = has_nv1,
+ 		ARM64_CPUID_FIELDS_NEG(ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1, E2H0, NI_NV1)
+ 	},
  	{},
  };
  

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped