linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MIPS: merge CONFIG_MACH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZdStsYqTkYBhCS4M@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 14:48:33 +0100
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: merge CONFIG_MACH_TX49XX entries

On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 11:14:45PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> The 'config MACH_TX49XX' entry exists in arch/mips/Kconfig with a
> prompt and one select statement, also in arch/mips/txx9/Kconfig with
> the other select statements.
> 
> Commit 8f8da9adebdf ("[MIPS] TXx9: Kconfig cleanup") added the second
> entry to arch/mips/txx9/Kconfig.
> 
> There is no reason to split it in the two locations.
> 
> Merge them into the entry in arch/mips/txx9/Kconfig.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
> ---
> 
>  arch/mips/Kconfig      | 4 ----
>  arch/mips/txx9/Kconfig | 3 ++-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/mips/Kconfig b/arch/mips/Kconfig
> index a70b4f959fb1..b7c62f8d612e 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/mips/Kconfig
> @@ -881,10 +881,6 @@ config SNI_RM
>  	  Technology and now in turn merged with Fujitsu.  Say Y here to
>  	  support this machine type.
>  
> -config MACH_TX49XX
> -	bool "Toshiba TX49 series based machines"
> -	select WAR_TX49XX_ICACHE_INDEX_INV

this is inside the choice for selecting the platform. Removing it here
breaks the build. IMHO the merge must be here.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]