[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7fe52cb9-12b9-4b03-8e55-08e59b4bef27@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 14:07:27 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
will@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V16 1/8] arm64/sysreg: Add BRBE registers and fields
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 02:05:24PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 01:59:03PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 01:52:38PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > It's a good point about the sorting, though the file is currently mostly
> > sorted by encoding rather than alphanumerically (similarly to how
> > sysreg.h was done).
> Sure, we're inconsistent. I'd just prefer that there's *some* local ordering
> here, as the patch is neither ordered as above nor by encoding:
I agree, I'm just saying that if we're going to fix the ordering it'd
probably be better to go along with what the rest of the file is doing.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists