linux-kernel - [PATCH] PM: EM: Fix nr_states warnings in static checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240221142550.1814055-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 14:25:50 +0000
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	rafael@...nel.org
Cc: lukasz.luba@....com,
	kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH] PM: EM: Fix nr_states warnings in static checks

During the static checks nr_states has been mentioned by the kernel test
robot. Fix the warning in those 2 places.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
---
 kernel/power/energy_model.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/power/energy_model.c b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
index 7101fa3fa0c0..b686ac0345bd 100644
--- a/kernel/power/energy_model.c
+++ b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
@@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ static int em_compute_costs(struct device *dev, struct em_perf_state *table,
  * em_dev_compute_costs() - Calculate cost values for new runtime EM table
  * @dev		: Device for which the EM table is to be updated
  * @table	: The new EM table that is going to get the costs calculated
+ * @nr_states	: Number of performance states
  *
  * Calculate the em_perf_state::cost values for new runtime EM table. The
  * values are used for EAS during task placement. It also calculates and sets
@@ -728,7 +729,6 @@ static void em_check_capacity_update(void)
 		struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
 		unsigned long em_max_perf;
 		struct device *dev;
-		int nr_states;
 
 		if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_done_mask))
 			continue;
@@ -749,7 +749,6 @@ static void em_check_capacity_update(void)
 		cpumask_or(cpu_done_mask, cpu_done_mask,
 			   em_span_cpus(pd));
 
-		nr_states = pd->nr_perf_states;
 		cpu_capacity = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
 
 		rcu_read_lock();
-- 
2.25.1