lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+L7uPimQfATs14EWCbqRO1vxDUmPie7=cChTLCf2od2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 07:27:04 -0700
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, 
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, 
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the arm-soc-fixes tree

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 7:00 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024, at 14:53, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 3:28 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auugorg.au> wrote:
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7793-gose.dtb: Warning (interrupt_map): Failed prerequisite 'interrupt_provider'
> >>
> >> Introduced/exposed by commit
> >>
> >>   78b6f8e7379b ("dtc: Enable dtc interrupt_provider check")
> >>
> >> I guess you missed some :-(
> >
> > No, Geert separately posted fixes for already.
>
> I did make the mistake of applying the final patch "dtc:
> Enable dtc interrupt_provider check" to the arm/fixes branch
> for 6.8 along with the other fixes.
>
> Clearly that should be separate and only go into mainline
> after there are no more regressions, but now I'm unsure
> about the other patches -- did you intend the dts fixes
> for 6.8 or for the coming merge window?

Either is fine with me. My intent was the whole series plus the
Renesas fix to be applied together. Anything new that crops up we can
fix on top.

Yes, there are lots of powerpc warnings, but those are on top of lots
of existing powerpc warnings no one seems to care about. I suppose we
can turn them off for powerpc if desired.

Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ