linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: Add SMB2360 pmic dtsi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 16:54:39 +0200
From: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: Add SMB2360 pmic dtsi

On 24-02-21 15:41:41, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 21.02.2024 15:38, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > Add nodes for SMB2360 with the eUSB2 repeater nodes.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/smb2360.dtsi | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/smb2360.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/smb2360.dtsi
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..8d7bdb56e6fe
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/smb2360.dtsi
> > @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (c) 2023, Linaro Limited
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> > +#include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h>
> > +
> > +/ {
> > +};
> > +
> > +&spmi_bus1 {
> > +	smb2360h: pmic@7 {
> 
> Hm, I'm not 100% sure about bringing in this letter-suffix notation..
> 
> But then, is there anything better? What are they called in schematics?
> SMB2360_n, perhaps?


Yeah, just realized that this is wrong. I need to do something like
sc8280xp-pmics.dtsi.

There are different sources of information for the suffix, some of them 
use smb2360k, some of them use smb2360_0. Will go with the second.

> 
> konrad