[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240221150303.GA2792906-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 08:03:03 -0700
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add missing prefixes used
in compatibles
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 05:51:37PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 09:38:45AM -0700, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 08:59:56AM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 08:58:29PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > + "^calao,.*":
> > > > + description: CALAO Systems SAS
> > > > "^calaosystems,.*":
> > > > description: CALAO Systems SAS
> > >
> > > > + "^IBM,.*":
> > > > + description: International Business Machines (IBM)
> > > > "^ibm,.*":
> > > > description: International Business Machines (IBM)
> > >
> > > These ones add duplicates with no indication of which one is to be used
> > > going forward. Why not mark one as deprecated?
> >
> > Because I couldn't decide which... It's a mixture with no clear pattern
> > of on what or when each one is used. Power is kind of special.
>
> That might be true for ibm, but is it true for calao systems?
> The website appears to now be something to do with Korean gambling, but
> the twitter remains and looks to have produced arm sbcs:
> https://twitter.com/calaosystems?lang=en
I used this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calao_Systems
The company went bankrupt in 2016. ST based systems used one prefix and
Atmel based systems used the other. Which do I pick to deprecate? I'm
not expecting any new boards either.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists