[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57ffc027-7870-4765-b837-4703c39c1236@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 16:52:26 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...hat.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Erico Nunes <nunes.erico@...il.com>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetbo@...hat.com>,
Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable zram, xfs and loading compressed
FW support
On 21/02/2024 16:49, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 04:39:18PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 21/02/2024 16:31, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024, at 13:59, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>>> These options are needed by some Linux distributions (e.g: Fedora), so
>>>> let's enable them to make it easier for developers using such distros.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>>>
>>>> @@ -1595,6 +1599,7 @@ CONFIG_HTE_TEGRA194_TEST=m
>>>> CONFIG_EXT2_FS=y
>>>> CONFIG_EXT3_FS=y
>>>> CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
>>>> +CONFIG_XFS_FS=m
>>>> CONFIG_BTRFS_FS=m
>>>> CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
>>>
>>> Unfortunately this will increase build time noticeably, but
>>> I agree it is the right thing to do.
>>>
>>> Can you send it (with any other acks) to soc@...nel.org so
>>> I can merge it from there?
>>
>> Due to XFS, please include:
>>
>> Nacked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>
>> so this will not be precedence used for further patches like this
>> (Maxime already used such argument, so I want to be sure it will not be
>> used against me in the future)
>
> For the record, I didn't use anything against *you*. I'd just like
> consistency over how defconfig rules are applied.
True, apologies if it seemed to harsh. I meant the discussion, so maybe
better:
"Maxime used such argument with discussion with me, so I want to be sure
there is no silent ack from me in the future."
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists