[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240221-hid-bpf-sleepable-v3-8-1fb378ca6301@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 17:25:24 +0100
From: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFC bpf-next v3 08/16] bpf/verifier: do_misc_fixups for
is_bpf_timer_set_sleepable_cb_kfunc
This is still a WIP, but I think this can be dropped as we never
get to this instruction. So what should we do here?
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 4766c43606c4..8a9f268c4ee2 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -19720,7 +19720,8 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
continue;
}
- if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_timer_set_callback) {
+ if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_timer_set_callback ||
+ is_bpf_timer_set_sleepable_cb_kfunc(insn->imm)) {
/* The verifier will process callback_fn as many times as necessary
* with different maps and the register states prepared by
* set_timer_callback_state will be accurate.
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists