linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 01/14] serial: core: Move struct uart

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZdZJKIrkeasBwL3i@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 21:04:08 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
	Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>,
	Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
	Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>, Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
	Al Cooper <alcooperx@...il.com>,
	Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
	Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
	Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/14] serial: core: Move struct uart_port::quirks
 closer to possible values

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 01:54:52PM -0500, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 20:31:17 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > Currently it's not crystal clear what UPIO_* and UPQ_* definitions
> > belong two. Reindent the code, so it will be easy to read and understand.
> 
> two -> to.

Ah, thanks, will fix!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko