linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Deduplicate cleanup for-loop in gpiochip_add_data_with

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240221193647.13777-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 21:36:47 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Deduplicate cleanup for-loop in gpiochip_add_data_with_key()

There is no need to repeat for-loop twice in the error path in
gpiochip_add_data_with_key(). Deduplicate it. While at it,
rename loop variable to be more specific and avoid ambguity.

It also properly unwinds the SRCU, i.e. in reversed order of allocating.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 26 +++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 1706edb3ee3f..60fa7816c799 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -861,7 +861,7 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
 			       struct lock_class_key *request_key)
 {
 	struct gpio_device *gdev;
-	unsigned int i, j;
+	unsigned int desc_index;
 	int base = 0;
 	int ret = 0;
 
@@ -965,8 +965,8 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
 		}
 	}
 
-	for (i = 0; i < gc->ngpio; i++)
-		gdev->descs[i].gdev = gdev;
+	for (desc_index = 0; desc_index < gc->ngpio; desc_index++)
+		gdev->descs[desc_index].gdev = gdev;
 
 	BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&gdev->line_state_notifier);
 	BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&gdev->device_notifier);
@@ -992,19 +992,16 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_cleanup_gdev_srcu;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < gc->ngpio; i++) {
-		struct gpio_desc *desc = &gdev->descs[i];
+	for (desc_index = 0; desc_index < gc->ngpio; desc_index++) {
+		struct gpio_desc *desc = &gdev->descs[desc_index];
 
 		ret = init_srcu_struct(&desc->srcu);
-		if (ret) {
-			for (j = 0; j < i; j++)
-				cleanup_srcu_struct(&gdev->descs[j].srcu);
-			goto err_free_gpiochip_mask;
-		}
+		if (ret)
+			goto err_cleanup_desc_srcu;
 
-		if (gc->get_direction && gpiochip_line_is_valid(gc, i)) {
+		if (gc->get_direction && gpiochip_line_is_valid(gc, desc_index)) {
 			assign_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT,
-				   &desc->flags, !gc->get_direction(gc, i));
+				   &desc->flags, !gc->get_direction(gc, desc_index));
 		} else {
 			assign_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT,
 				   &desc->flags, !gc->direction_input);
@@ -1061,9 +1058,8 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
 	gpiochip_free_hogs(gc);
 	of_gpiochip_remove(gc);
 err_cleanup_desc_srcu:
-	for (i = 0; i < gdev->ngpio; i++)
-		cleanup_srcu_struct(&gdev->descs[i].srcu);
-err_free_gpiochip_mask:
+	while (desc_index--)
+		cleanup_srcu_struct(&gdev->descs[desc_index].srcu);
 	gpiochip_free_valid_mask(gc);
 err_cleanup_gdev_srcu:
 	cleanup_srcu_struct(&gdev->srcu);
-- 
2.43.0.rc1.1.gbec44491f096