[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <zospejkdqekbndbov3ubbbvr5skxwohezeslzciivhxakfjoek@oa5sp2ffcfix>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:45:35 -0600
From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@...nel.org>, Thomas
Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>, "Maarten
Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard
<mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Dave Airlie
<airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Rodrigo Vivi
<rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@...el.com>, "Matthew
Brost" <matthew.brost@...el.com>, Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@...el.com>,
"Daniele Ceraolo Spurio" <daniele.ceraolospurio@...el.com>,
<intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: skip building debugfs code for
CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 05:21:17PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>Hi Lucas,
>
>On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:29:54 -0600 Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> Looking at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=2d5c7b7eb345249cb34d42cbc2b97b4c57ea944e
>> it seems we still don't have drm-xe-next branch in linux-next.
>>
>> Stephen, could you please add it? Or do I have to do something on my end
>> before that? This is the branch:
>>
>> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel drm-xe-next
>
>Added from tomorrow. Currently the only contact is yourself. Do you
>want anyone else (or a mailing list) as well?
>
>Do you want the drm-xe-fixes branch included as well?
I don't think it's needed since drm-xe-next covers what is in
drm-xe-fixes. Please add other maintainers and mailing list:
M: Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@...nel.org>
M: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>
L: intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org
Looking at drm-intel and drm-misc, they are using a special
for-linux-next. We may eventually adopt the same workflow, but I will
have to check with other maintainers.
thanks
Lucas De Marchi
>
>Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next. As
>you may know, this is not a judgement of your code. The purpose of
>linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of
>conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window.
>
>You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
>been:
> * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
> Signed-off-by,
> * posted to the relevant mailing list,
> * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
> * successfully unit tested, and
> * destined for the current or next Linux merge window.
>
>Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
>to fetch). It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.
>
>--
>Cheers,
>Stephen Rothwell
>sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Powered by blists - more mailing lists