[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240221-sputter-tinker-48ed252e0a0a@spud>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 20:02:02 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc: "antoniu.miclaus@...log.com" <antoniu.miclaus@...log.com>,
"alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"jdelvare@...e.com" <jdelvare@...e.com>,
"linux@...ck-us.net" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
Zeynep Arslanbenzer <Zeynep.Arslanbenzer@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] dt-bindings: rtc: add max313xx RTCs
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 08:11:13PM +0000, Chris Packham wrote:
> On 21/02/24 08:21, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 11:18:24AM +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
> > The one thing I do want the comment on is the number of examples.
> > I don't really see what we gain from having 3 - I'd roll the clock
> > provider example into with one of the other ones I think.
> The 3 examples are an artifact of me combining the in-flight max313xx
> series with the one that landed. The clock output is only valid for some
> chips but that's probably just a matter of picking the right compatible.
Yeah, I think you could collapse it in, if you modify the compatible
appropriately.
Cheers,
Conor.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists