lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4562925.LvFx2qVVIh@kreacher>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 20:59:45 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
 Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
 "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject:
 [PATCH v1 0/4] ACPI: scan: Check enabled _STA bit on Bus/Device Checks

Hi,

This series adds _STA enabled bit checking for processors (in all cases)
and for all devices in the Bus Check and Device Check notification handling
paths.  It does so without any side-effects on non-processor devices, unlike

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/E1rVDmP-0027YJ-EW@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk/

The first patch fixes an issue with failing Device Check notifications
without a valid reason.

The next two patches together make Bus Check and Device Check notification
handling take the enabled bit into account.

The last patch modifies the processor scan handler to check the enabled bit
it its add callback.

I would appreciate testing this on a system where the enabled bit really
matters.

Thanks!




Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ