linux-kernel - Re: [syzbot] [kernel?] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference in hrtimer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:29:16 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+039399a9b96297ddedca@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [kernel?] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
 dereference in hrtimer_active

On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 00:01:03 +0100 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> So something in that syzbot test case manages to tear down a napi
> context which has not yet been fully initialized. While the rest of
> napi_disable() does not care much as long as neither NAPIF_STATE_SCHED
> nor NAPIF_STATE_NPSVC are set in napi->state, hrtimer_cancel() pretty
> much cares as demonstrated by the NULL pointer dereference.
> 
> While it would be trivial to harden the hrtimer code for the case that a
> non-initialized hrtimer is canceled, I wonder whether this invocation of
> napi_disable() is harmless (aside of the hrtimer issue) or if there are
> some hidden subtle issues with that.

Thanks for the forward, I stared at it for a bit and I can see one way
to make veth disable unregistered NAPI. I'll send a fix shortly.