linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/16] clk: samsung: Add CPU clocks for Exynos850

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPLW+4kmoCoqO=+zXbVw7VsGc-VB2At91ZnJfyTDRtVFmN4aiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 17:07:50 -0600
From: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, 
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, 
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] clk: samsung: Add CPU clocks for Exynos850

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 5:07 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 16/02/2024 23:32, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> > The series implements CPU clock support for Exynos850, adds CPU CMUs to
> > the clock driver and enables those in dts. This is the first step
> > towards cpufreq implementation.
> >
> > The breakup by patch:
> >
> >   * Patch 01: Add bindings
> >   * Patches 02..12: Prepare clk-cpu.c for Exynos850 support
> >   * Patch 13: Add Exynos850 support
> >   * Patch 14: Init PLLs to be in manual mode
> >   * Patch 15: Add CPU CMUs in Exynos850 clock driver
> >   * Patch 16: Add CPU CMUs and clocks in Exynos850 dtsi
>
> This crossed the threshold for a patch bomb, which is in general fine
> for me, but then please put v2 changelog in each patch's changelog. If
> the patch did not change, annotate it as well. It's not possible to keep
> jumping between cover letter and individual patches.
>

The above list is not a change log, I just tried to show that patches
02..12 are cleanups. I'll reword this in v2 to make it less confusing.
And as usual I'll keep the changelog for each patch separately. Thanks
for the review!

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>