linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 01/10] KVM: arm64: vgic: Store LPIs in an xarray

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240221054253.3848076-2-oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 05:42:44 +0000
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
To: kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v4 01/10] KVM: arm64: vgic: Store LPIs in an xarray

Using a linked-list for LPIs is less than ideal as it of course requires
iterative searches to find a particular entry. An xarray is a better
data structure for this use case, as it provides faster searches and can
still handle a potentially sparse range of INTID allocations.

Start by storing LPIs in an xarray, punting usage of the xarray to a
subsequent change. The observant among you will notice that we added yet
another lock to the chain of locking order rules; document the ordering
of the xa_lock. Don't worry, we'll get rid of the lpi_list_lock one
day...

Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c |  3 +++
 arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c  | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c      |  4 +++-
 include/kvm/arm_vgic.h          |  2 ++
 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
index e949e1d0fd9f..411719053107 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ void kvm_vgic_early_init(struct kvm *kvm)
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dist->lpi_list_head);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dist->lpi_translation_cache);
 	raw_spin_lock_init(&dist->lpi_list_lock);
+	xa_init_flags(&dist->lpi_xa, XA_FLAGS_LOCK_IRQ);
 }
 
 /* CREATION */
@@ -366,6 +367,8 @@ static void kvm_vgic_dist_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
 
 	if (vgic_supports_direct_msis(kvm))
 		vgic_v4_teardown(kvm);
+
+	xa_destroy(&dist->lpi_xa);
 }
 
 static void __kvm_vgic_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
index e2764d0ffa9f..fb2d3c356984 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
@@ -52,6 +52,12 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_add_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, u32 intid,
 	if (!irq)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
+	ret = xa_reserve_irq(&dist->lpi_xa, intid, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
+	if (ret) {
+		kfree(irq);
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
+	}
+
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&irq->lpi_list);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&irq->ap_list);
 	raw_spin_lock_init(&irq->irq_lock);
@@ -86,12 +92,22 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_add_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, u32 intid,
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 
+	ret = xa_err(xa_store(&dist->lpi_xa, intid, irq, 0));
+	if (ret) {
+		xa_release(&dist->lpi_xa, intid);
+		kfree(irq);
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
+
 	list_add_tail(&irq->lpi_list, &dist->lpi_list_head);
 	dist->lpi_list_count++;
 
 out_unlock:
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
 
+	if (ret)
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
+
 	/*
 	 * We "cache" the configuration table entries in our struct vgic_irq's.
 	 * However we only have those structs for mapped IRQs, so we read in
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
index db2a95762b1b..92e4d2fea365 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
@@ -30,7 +30,8 @@ struct vgic_global kvm_vgic_global_state __ro_after_init = {
  *         its->its_lock (mutex)
  *           vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock		must be taken with IRQs disabled
  *             kvm->lpi_list_lock		must be taken with IRQs disabled
- *               vgic_irq->irq_lock		must be taken with IRQs disabled
+ *               vgic_dist->lpi_xa.xa_lock	must be taken with IRQs disabled
+ *                 vgic_irq->irq_lock		must be taken with IRQs disabled
  *
  * As the ap_list_lock might be taken from the timer interrupt handler,
  * we have to disable IRQs before taking this lock and everything lower
@@ -131,6 +132,7 @@ void __vgic_put_lpi_locked(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq)
 		return;
 
 	list_del(&irq->lpi_list);
+	xa_erase(&dist->lpi_xa, irq->intid);
 	dist->lpi_list_count--;
 
 	kfree(irq);
diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
index 8cc38e836f54..795b35656b54 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/static_key.h>
 #include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/xarray.h>
 #include <kvm/iodev.h>
 #include <linux/list.h>
 #include <linux/jump_label.h>
@@ -275,6 +276,7 @@ struct vgic_dist {
 
 	/* Protects the lpi_list and the count value below. */
 	raw_spinlock_t		lpi_list_lock;
+	struct xarray		lpi_xa;
 	struct list_head	lpi_list_head;
 	int			lpi_list_count;
 
-- 
2.44.0.rc0.258.g7320e95886-goog