linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next] ASoC: tas2781: Remove redundant initialization of pointer 'data'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <170847652597.70487.7579277890832174117.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 00:48:45 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Shenghao Ding <shenghao-ding@...com>, Kevin Lu <kevin-lu@...com>, 
 Baojun Xu <baojun.xu@...com>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, 
 Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, 
 linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] ASoC: tas2781: Remove redundant initialization
 of pointer 'data'

On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 14:22:19 +0000, Colin Ian King wrote:
> The pointer 'data' being initialized with a value that is never read, it
> is being re-assigned inside a while-loop. The initialization is redundant
> and can be removed.
> 
> Cleans up clang scan build warning
> sound/soc/codecs/tas2781-fmwlib.c:1534:17: warning: Value stored to
> 'data' during its initialization is never read [deadcode.DeadStores]
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: tas2781: Remove redundant initialization of pointer 'data'
      commit: e480c0991db00b24b39010bfd56eda5ec2417186

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark