[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <170848061727.1313505.8320377887775957635.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 18:00:13 -0800
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Fixup module symbol end address properly
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:33:22 -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> I got a strange error on ARM to fail on processing FINISHED_ROUND
> record. It turned out that it was failing in symbol__alloc_hist()
> because the symbol size is too big.
>
> When a sample is captured on a specific BPF program, it failed. I've
> added a debug code and found the end address of the symbol is from
> the next module which is placed far way.
>
> [...]
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
[1/1] perf tools: Fixup module symbol end address properly
commit: bacefe0c7b77b7527a613e053b6d378412a8a779
Best regards,
--
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists