linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] erofs: fix refcount on the metabuf used for inode lookup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6c2d5345-98bc-49b1-adc7-bcc349a0a6bb@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 10:18:22 +0800
From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Sandeep Dhavale <dhavale@...gle.com>, Gao Xiang <xiang@...nel.org>,
 Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>, Yue Hu <huyue2@...lpad.com>,
 Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: quic_wenjieli@...cinc.com, stable@...r.kernel.org,
 kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] erofs: fix refcount on the metabuf used for inode
 lookup

Hi Sandeep,

On 2024/2/21 03:11, Sandeep Dhavale wrote:
> In erofs_find_target_block() when erofs_dirnamecmp() returns 0,
> we do not assign the target metabuf. This causes the caller
> erofs_namei()'s erofs_put_metabuf() at the end to be not effective
> leaving the refcount on the page.
> As the page from metabuf (buf->page) is never put, such page cannot be
> migrated or reclaimed. Fix it now by putting the metabuf from
> previous loop and assigning the current metabuf to target before
> returning so caller erofs_namei() can do the final put as it was
> intended.
> 
> Fixes: 500edd095648 ("erofs: use meta buffers for inode lookup")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sandeep Dhavale <dhavale@...gle.com>

Many thanks for the catch!

> ---
>   fs/erofs/namei.c | 5 ++++-
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/namei.c b/fs/erofs/namei.c
> index d4f631d39f0f..bfe1c926436b 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/namei.c
> @@ -132,7 +132,10 @@ static void *erofs_find_target_block(struct erofs_buf *target,
>   
>   			if (!diff) {
>   				*_ndirents = 0;
> -				goto out;
> +				if (!IS_ERR(candidate))
> +					erofs_put_metabuf(target);
> +				*target = buf;
> +				return de;
>   			} else if (diff > 0) {
>   				head = mid + 1;
>   				startprfx = matched;

The fix is correct, yet I tend to try to reorganize this snippet for
simplicity, how about the following diff (untested)?

If it looks good to you, could you resend a formal patch? Thanks!

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

  fs/erofs/namei.c | 29 ++++++++++++++---------------
  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/erofs/namei.c b/fs/erofs/namei.c
index d4f631d39f0f..9fb2d627578e 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/erofs/namei.c
@@ -129,25 +129,24 @@ static void *erofs_find_target_block(struct erofs_buf *target,

  			/* string comparison without already matched prefix */
  			diff = erofs_dirnamecmp(name, &dname, &matched);
-
-			if (!diff) {
-				*_ndirents = 0;
-				goto out;
-			} else if (diff > 0) {
-				head = mid + 1;
-				startprfx = matched;
-
-				if (!IS_ERR(candidate))
-					erofs_put_metabuf(target);
-				*target = buf;
-				candidate = de;
-				*_ndirents = ndirents;
-			} else {
+			if (diff < 0) {
  				erofs_put_metabuf(&buf);
-
  				back = mid - 1;
  				endprfx = matched;
+				continue;
  			}
+
+			if (!IS_ERR(candidate))
+				erofs_put_metabuf(target);
+			*target = buf;
+			if (!diff) {
+				*_ndirents = 0;
+				return de;
+			}
+			head = mid + 1;
+			startprfx = matched;
+			candidate = de;
+			*_ndirents = ndirents;
  			continue;
  		}
  out:		/* free if the candidate is valid */
--
2.39.3