linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net/af_iucv: fix virtual vs physical address confusion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b96f27a5-53fa-495b-b1a4-cff574898083@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:41:23 +0100
From: Alexandra Winter <wintera@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Thorsten Winkler <twinkler@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/af_iucv: fix virtual vs physical address confusion



On 21.02.24 23:31, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:36:57 +0100 Alexandra Winter wrote:
>> I would have preferred to do all the translations in __iucv_* functions in iucv.c,
>> but I understand that for __iucv_message_receive() this would mean significant changes. 
> 
> FWIW we're assuming this is going via the s390 tree.
> Please let us know if you prefer networking to pick it up.
> 

Hello Jakub and maintainers,

please take this patch via net-next, as it belongs to the net/iucv module.
Please excuse that it was not flagged with [PATCH net-next]

Kind regards
Alexandra