[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240222152034.462805-1-laura.nao@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 16:20:34 +0100
From: Laura Nao <laura.nao@...labora.com>
To: laura.nao@...labora.com
Cc: a.hindborg@...sung.com,
alex.gaynor@...il.com,
aliceryhl@...gle.com,
benno.lossin@...ton.me,
bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com,
boqun.feng@...il.com,
davidgow@...gle.com,
gary@...yguo.net,
kernel@...labora.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com,
ojeda@...nel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
shuah@...nel.org,
wedsonaf@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kselftest: Add basic test for probing the rust sample modules
On 1/2/24 15:25, Laura Nao wrote:
> I agree factoring out the helpers might be a better solution. I sent a
> patch to move the ktap_helpers.sh file to the kselftest common
> directory, so that kselftests written in bash can make use of the helper
> functions more easily:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20240102141528.169947-1-laura.nao@collabora.com/T/#u
>
> If that patch is merged first, I'll rework this one and send a v2 with
> the proper adjustments.
>
v2 sent: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20240222151009.461264-1-laura.nao@collabora.com/T/#u
Best,
Laura
Powered by blists - more mailing lists