[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <045bfb84-9833-442c-ac54-ed7a26451afa@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 16:32:09 +0100
From: Marco Pagani <marpagan@...hat.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@....com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] drm/test: add a test suite for GEM objects backed by
shmem
On 2024-02-18 16:49, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 06:14:16PM +0100, Marco Pagani wrote:
>> This patch introduces an initial KUnit test suite for GEM objects
>> backed by shmem buffers.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Marco Pagani <marpagan@...hat.com>
>
> When running this in qemu, I get lots of warnings backtraces in the drm
> core.
>
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1341 at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c:327
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1341 at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c:173
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1341 at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c:385
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1341 at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c:211
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1345 at kernel/dma/mapping.c:194
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1347 at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c:429
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1349 at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c:445
>
> It looks like dma_resv_assert_held() asserts each time it is executed.
> The backtrace in kernel/dma/mapping.c is triggered by
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!dev->dma_mask))
> return 0;
> in __dma_map_sg_attrs().
>
> Is this a possible problem in the test code, or can it be caused by
> some limitations or bugs in the qemu emulation ? If so, do you have any
> thoughts or ideas what those limitations / bugs might be ?
Hi Guenter,
Thanks for reporting this issue. As you correctly noted, the warnings appear to
be caused by the dma_mask in the mock device being uninitialized. I'll send a
patch to fix it soon.
Marco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists