lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fwkiemz7vg4nnswxmzwrd7stxe2agzg24b6iykhimqn7qdxini@keoa37xaghip>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 11:09:41 -0600
From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@...nel.org>, Thomas Hellström
	<thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>, DRM XE List
	<intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org>, Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, "Linux
 Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
	<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-xe tree

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 07:04:48PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>After merging the drm-xe tree, today's linux-next build (arm64 defconfig)
>failed like this:
>
>arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S: Assembler messages:
>arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:557: Error: found 'l', expected: ')'
>arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:29:  Info: macro invoked from here
>arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:221:   Info: macro invoked from here
>arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:557: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement
>arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:557: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `l'
>arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:560: Error: found 'l', expected: ')'
>arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:560: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement
>arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S:560: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `l'
>
>and many, many more.
>
>Bisected to commit
>
>  b77cb9640f1f ("bits: introduce fixed-type genmasks")
>
>I have reverted that commit (and the following 2) for today.

those commits were already removed from our branch due to those issues.
New fixed version of them should appear through the new bitmap tree
maintained by Yury.

Sorry for the noise they caused and thanks.

Lucas De Marchi

>
>-- 
>Cheers,
>Stephen Rothwell



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ