linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] mm: remove total

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZdeAys9D98RBaPL1@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 17:13:46 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm: remove total_mapcount()

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 05:09:43PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> We always get a head page, so we can just naturally interpret is as a folio
> (similar to other code).

memfd seems rather confused about how to iterate over the page cache.
Perhaps we could sort that out and then delete total_mapcount as a
second patch?

I haven't tested this at all, but ...

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>

diff --git a/mm/memfd.c b/mm/memfd.c
index d3a1ba4208c9..45e55b0e3cbe 100644
--- a/mm/memfd.c
+++ b/mm/memfd.c
@@ -29,28 +29,29 @@
 #define MEMFD_TAG_PINNED        PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE
 #define LAST_SCAN               4       /* about 150ms max */
 
+static bool memfd_extra_refs(struct folio *folio)
+{
+	return folio_ref_count(folio) - folio_mapcount(folio) !=
+		folio_nr_pages(folio);
+}
+
 static void memfd_tag_pins(struct xa_state *xas)
 {
-	struct page *page;
+	struct folio *folio;
 	int latency = 0;
-	int cache_count;
 
 	lru_add_drain();
 
 	xas_lock_irq(xas);
-	xas_for_each(xas, page, ULONG_MAX) {
-		cache_count = 1;
-		if (!xa_is_value(page) &&
-		    PageTransHuge(page) && !PageHuge(page))
-			cache_count = HPAGE_PMD_NR;
-
-		if (!xa_is_value(page) &&
-		    page_count(page) - total_mapcount(page) != cache_count)
+	xas_for_each(xas, folio, ULONG_MAX) {
+		/* Can we have shadow/swap entries in memfd? */
+		if (xa_is_value(folio))
+			continue;
+
+		if (memfd_extra_refs(folio))
 			xas_set_mark(xas, MEMFD_TAG_PINNED);
-		if (cache_count != 1)
-			xas_set(xas, page->index + cache_count);
 
-		latency += cache_count;
+		latency++;
 		if (latency < XA_CHECK_SCHED)
 			continue;
 		latency = 0;
@@ -75,7 +76,6 @@ static void memfd_tag_pins(struct xa_state *xas)
 static int memfd_wait_for_pins(struct address_space *mapping)
 {
 	XA_STATE(xas, &mapping->i_pages, 0);
-	struct page *page;
 	int error, scan;
 
 	memfd_tag_pins(&xas);
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static int memfd_wait_for_pins(struct address_space *mapping)
 	error = 0;
 	for (scan = 0; scan <= LAST_SCAN; scan++) {
 		int latency = 0;
-		int cache_count;
+		struct folio *folio;
 
 		if (!xas_marked(&xas, MEMFD_TAG_PINNED))
 			break;
@@ -95,16 +95,10 @@ static int memfd_wait_for_pins(struct address_space *mapping)
 
 		xas_set(&xas, 0);
 		xas_lock_irq(&xas);
-		xas_for_each_marked(&xas, page, ULONG_MAX, MEMFD_TAG_PINNED) {
+		xas_for_each_marked(&xas, folio, ULONG_MAX, MEMFD_TAG_PINNED) {
 			bool clear = true;
 
-			cache_count = 1;
-			if (!xa_is_value(page) &&
-			    PageTransHuge(page) && !PageHuge(page))
-				cache_count = HPAGE_PMD_NR;
-
-			if (!xa_is_value(page) && cache_count !=
-			    page_count(page) - total_mapcount(page)) {
+			if (memfd_extra_refs(folio)) {
 				/*
 				 * On the last scan, we clean up all those tags
 				 * we inserted; but make a note that we still
@@ -118,8 +112,7 @@ static int memfd_wait_for_pins(struct address_space *mapping)
 			if (clear)
 				xas_clear_mark(&xas, MEMFD_TAG_PINNED);
 
-			latency += cache_count;
-			if (latency < XA_CHECK_SCHED)
+			if (++latency < XA_CHECK_SCHED)
 				continue;
 			latency = 0;