linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next v3 09/16] HID: bpf/dispatch: regroup kfuncs definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 22:17:31 +0200
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov
 <ast@...nel.org>,  Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, John Fastabend
 <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin
 KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song
 <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav
 Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa
 <jolsa@...nel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,  Benjamin Tissoires
 <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah
 Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next v3 09/16] HID: bpf/dispatch: regroup kfuncs
 definitions

On Wed, 2024-02-21 at 17:25 +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:

[...]

> diff --git a/drivers/hid/bpf/hid_bpf_dispatch.c b/drivers/hid/bpf/hid_bpf_dispatch.c
> index e630caf644e8..52abb27426f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/bpf/hid_bpf_dispatch.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/bpf/hid_bpf_dispatch.c
> @@ -143,48 +143,6 @@ u8 *call_hid_bpf_rdesc_fixup(struct hid_device *hdev, u8 *rdesc, unsigned int *s
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_hid_bpf_rdesc_fixup);
>  
> -/* Disables missing prototype warnings */
> -__bpf_kfunc_start_defs();

Note:
this patch does not apply on top of current bpf-next [0] because
__bpf_kfunc_start_defs and __bpf_kfunc are not present in [0].

[0] commit 58fd62e0aa50 ("bpf: Clarify batch lookup/lookup_and_delete semantics")

> -
> -/**
> - * hid_bpf_get_data - Get the kernel memory pointer associated with the context @ctx
> - *
> - * @ctx: The HID-BPF context
> - * @offset: The offset within the memory
> - * @rdwr_buf_size: the const size of the buffer
> - *
> - * @returns %NULL on error, an %__u8 memory pointer on success
> - */
> -__bpf_kfunc __u8 *
> -hid_bpf_get_data(struct hid_bpf_ctx *ctx, unsigned int offset, const size_t rdwr_buf_size)
> -{
> -	struct hid_bpf_ctx_kern *ctx_kern;
> -
> -	if (!ctx)
> -		return NULL;

[...]