[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240222211334.xvgwe33dsj7digrt@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 22:13:34 +0100
From: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com, kernel@...gutronix.de,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
jun.li@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: usb: typec-tcpci: add tcpci fallback
binding
On 24-02-22, Marco Felsch wrote:
> On 24-02-22, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 15/02/2024 22:28, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > > The NXP PTN5110 [1] is an TCPCI [2] compatible chip, so add the fallback
> > > binding.
> > >
> > > [1] https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/PTN5110.pdf
> > > [2] https://www.usb.org/sites/default/files/documents/usb-port_controller_specification_rev2.0_v1.0_0.pdf
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
> > > ---
> > > v2:
> > > - rephrase commit message
> > >
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/nxp,ptn5110.yaml | 4 +++-
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/nxp,ptn5110.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/nxp,ptn5110.yaml
> > > index eaedb4cc6b6c..7bd7bbbac9e0 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/nxp,ptn5110.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/nxp,ptn5110.yaml
> > > @@ -11,7 +11,9 @@ maintainers:
> > >
> > > properties:
> > > compatible:
> > > - const: nxp,ptn5110
> > > + enum:
> > > + - nxp,ptn5110
> > > + - tcpci
> >
> > That's not a fallback, but enum. Fallback is "items" and then you could
>
> Damn, you're right. Sorry.
>
> > also send a follow-up patchset (separate, so Greg won't take it) fixing
> > DTS (if not, let me know, so I will fix it).
>
> Sry. but I don't get this. Why do I need to send a follow-up? Greg did
> not apply anything, at least I didn't received an e-mail, that this
> patchset was picked.
Got it now and made it this way.
Regards,
Marco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists