[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGETcx9v_NHhC4EwKDQ1UQMQQB=B2e1nQSqJZAwc7VwEWztp8g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 19:41:16 -0800
From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>, Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] dt-bindings: Add post-init-providers property
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 4:23 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 15:30:23 -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > The post-init-providers property can be used to break a dependency cycle by
> > marking some provider(s) as a post device initialization provider(s). This
> > allows an OS to do a better job at ordering initialization and
> > suspend/resume of the devices in a dependency cycle.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/post-init-providers.yaml | 105 ++++++++++++++++++
> > MAINTAINERS | 13 ++-
> > 2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/post-init-providers.yaml
> >
>
> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
>
> yamllint warnings/errors:
>
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/post-init-providers.example.dtb: /example-0/clock-controller@...0: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['vendor,soc4-gcc', 'vendor,soc1-gcc']
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/post-init-providers.example.dtb: /example-0/clock-controller@...0: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['vendor,soc4-gcc', 'vendor,soc1-gcc']
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/post-init-providers.example.dtb: /example-0/clock-controller@...0: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['vendor,soc4-dispcc', 'vendor,soc1-dispcc']
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/post-init-providers.example.dtb: /example-0/clock-controller@...0: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['vendor,soc4-dispcc', 'vendor,soc1-dispcc']
I'm assuming it's okay to ignore these warnings about made up
compatible string names.
> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
> Warning: MAINTAINERS references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/post-init-supplier.yaml
> MAINTAINERS: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/post-init-supplier.yaml
Will fix this and send out v4. Ignore the v3 series please.
-Saravana
>
> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20240221233026.2915061-4-saravanak@google.com
>
> The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency
> should be noted in *this* patch.
>
> If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
> error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
> date:
>
> pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
>
> Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note
> that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking
> your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists