[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19d3087a-dc2c-455a-b225-6ac114631f74@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:18:46 -0800
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "James
Morse" <james.morse@....com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, "Ingo
Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Babu Moger
<Babu.Moger@....com>, <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>, "D Scott
Phillips OS" <scott@...amperecomputing.com>, <carl@...amperecomputing.com>,
<lcherian@...vell.com>, <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>,
<tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>, <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, Jamie Iles
<quic_jiles@...cinc.com>, Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
<peternewman@...gle.com>, <dfustini@...libre.com>, <amitsinght@...vell.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/resctrl: Pass domain to target CPU
Hi Tony,
Is sending new versions of patch series in response to the previous
versions a new custom? I am finding the SNC thread [1] to have become
a maze and now this thread is headed in the same direction. My understanding
of custom (supported by [2]) is to send new versions as a new thread.
This thread even complicates it more by mixing versions of different
features in the same email thread.
Reinette
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230713163207.219710-1-tony.luck@intel.com/
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#explicit-in-reply-to-headers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists