[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGS_qxqQ09wUppF9s1BgNoj5T2yo8+Yd0RLRBisj5th7Yw97eQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:37:35 -0800
From: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
To: Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>
Cc: shuah@...nel.org, davidgow@...gle.com, brendan.higgins@...ux.dev,
kevko@...gle.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kunit: tool: add parsing of all files in directory
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 2:18 PM Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Add ability to parse all files within a directory. Additionally add the
> ability to parse all results in the KUnit debugfs repository.
Nice, I'd been hoping for this.
It's enough to pull me back in for a bit :)
<snip>
> tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
> index bc74088c458a..827e6dac40ae 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
> @@ -511,19 +511,40 @@ def exec_handler(cli_args: argparse.Namespace) -> None:
>
>
> def parse_handler(cli_args: argparse.Namespace) -> None:
> - if cli_args.file is None:
> + parsed_files = []
optional: can we annotate the type?
parsed_files = [] # type: List[str]
> + total_test = kunit_parser.Test()
> + total_test.status = kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS
> + if cli_args.file_path is None:
> sys.stdin.reconfigure(errors='backslashreplace') # type: ignore
> kunit_output = sys.stdin # type: Iterable[str]
This branch no longer does anything, since we only parse what's in
`parsed_files`
E.g. if you try
$ kunit.py parse $FILENAME
it'll work whereas
$ kunit.py parse < $FILENAME
will do nothing
We'll need to rework the control flow somehow
> - else:
> - with open(cli_args.file, 'r', errors='backslashreplace') as f:
> + elif cli_args.file_path == "debugfs":
> + for (root, _, files) in os.walk("/sys/kernel/debug/kunit"):
> + for file in files:
> + if file == "results":
> + parsed_files.append(os.path.join(root, file))
> + elif os.path.isdir(cli_args.file_path):
> + for (root, _, files) in os.walk(cli_args.file_path):
> + for file in files:
> + parsed_files.append(os.path.join(root, file))
just a note here, we could make this a bit terser via
parsed_files.extend(os.path.join(root, f) for f in files)
and the debugfs branch could be rendered as
parsed_files.extend(os.path.join(root, f) for f in files if f == "results")
> + elif os.path.isfile(cli_args.file_path):
> + parsed_files.append(cli_args.file_path)
nit: should there be an `else` here that prints a warning?
Example that would trigger this case and silently do nothing
$ mkfifo /tmp/example_fifo
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse /tmp/example_fifo
<no output>
<snip>
> @@ -569,8 +590,8 @@ def main(argv: Sequence[str]) -> None:
> help='Parses KUnit results from a file, '
> 'and parses formatted results')
> add_parse_opts(parse_parser)
> - parse_parser.add_argument('file',
> - help='Specifies the file to read results from.',
> + parse_parser.add_argument('file_path',
> + help='Specifies the file path to read results from.',
Should this mention that the make `debugfs` string works?
> type=str, nargs='?', metavar='input_file')
Tangent: would it be useful to allow the user to pass in multiple
files now and set this to nargs='*'?
E.g.
$ kunit.py parse /my/dir/some_prefix*
It would also let people implement their own version of the debugfs logic via
$ find /other/debugfs/dir -name 'results' | xargs kunit.py parse
That could be useful if the user has recursively copied off the
debugfs from a test machine and wants to inspect it elsewhere, for
example.
Thanks,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists